“Hey, I don’t wanna work here anymore,” whispers a man inaudibly, knocking on his boss’s door, in an Instagram video interestingly titled “Me quiet quitting but not understanding the concept at all.” This hilarious video is one of many posted on social media platforms on a phenomenon called Quiet Quitting.
As social media becomes a reserve of content on quiet quitting, one is often left wondering, what exactly is it? Or what should employers do if faced with quiet quitters at work? Read the article to answer some questions about quiet quitting.
Quiet quitting is not just a trendy hashtag but a phenomenon birthed in response to poor work-life balance. Many refer to quiet quitting as the act of not going above and beyond at work. Quiet quitters support the idea of strictly sticking to your job description; not less, not more. People supporting quiet quitting refuse to put in extra work hours or make their work the central part of their life.
Equipped with the tools of social media platforms, quiet quitting quickly became a buzz-worthy topic when younger millennials and Gen Z shared their thoughts on preserving their time outside of work by doing only their job. While some might view quiet quitting as creating healthy boundaries in their workplace, some people consider it negatively.
There are multiple ways to approach quiet quitting. Emily (@emilybruth) shares various perspectives through which quiet quitting can be interpreted by different groups in an Instagram post.
On the one hand, workers are struggling with a poor work-life balance; on the other, employers are concerned over dwindling productivity in the workplace. While a historic decrease in productivity can raise some serious questions, it seems like a problem created by multiple causes.
Alarmingly, in an attempt to find ways to enhance productivity, many companies have turned to worker surveillance tools. Such attempts dangerously loom over morally gray areas.
Moreover, these surveillance experiments rely on technologies that monitor employee behavior. Not only do these technologies invade an employee’s privacy, but the entire responsibility for productivity seems to fall on employees’ shoulders. Therefore, employers must adopt a holistic approach to enhance and assess productivity, including efforts from all members of an organization and not just a select few.
Whether you view quiet quitting as a revolutionary movement to balance work and life or view it as a force disrupting workplace productivity, you cannot deny its impact on an organization.
But is quiet quitting really a new thing? Or has it already been around?
Quiet quitting can resemble coasting if it is viewed as doing the bare minimum at work. Quiet quitting can also be considered a repackaging of existing employee behaviors made prominent due to multiple events: reduced wages, burnout, and a pandemic!
A famous report by Gallup posits that at least half of the US workforce is quiet quitting. Employees can move towards quiet quitting if they feel disengaged with their work. Gallup’s survey shows that 18% of 15,091 employees are actively disengaged at work.
The survey shows that the number of engaged employees in 2022 dropped to 32%, and disengaged employees went up from 16% to 18%. There are several employees who might feel detached from their work. In such a scenario, doing the bare minimum can sound challenging too.
Burnout from work could be another reason why employees want to only opt for tasks they are required to do.
Even though employees were overworked before the pandemic, its onset brought them a wave of urgency and panic. Flexible working hours and work from home also meant that their job now invaded their safe space. According to Gallup surveys, workers’ stress and worry rates reached 60% and 58%, respectively, by March 2020. Stress has been at an all-time high among workers, with even a notification ping triggering them.
Lack of reward and recognition at work can also lead to employees distancing themself from work.
Continuous efforts that yield no result can frustrate employees to the point of not caring anymore. Rewards encourage employees to do better . Work can seem like a repetitive and dull series of events without any recognition from employers. Disengagement at work can directly result from the disappointment that follows unrecognized efforts.
There are many factors driving employees to go down the quiet quitting path. Employees are, after all, human—those with needs that should be fulfilled. A theory called Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs lists five basic human needs: physiological, safety, love and belonging, esteem, and self-actualization. A job can fulfill a person’s physiological and safety needs but cannot lead to a sense of love, belonging, and self-esteem. A vicious cycle of work and unending stress drives employees to become numb.
Perhaps employees who choose quiet quitting cannot fulfill their love and belonging, esteem, and self-actualization needs through work. As a result, they feel no connection to their job.
Even though quiet quitting has become viral on social media and is being practiced by employees, it seems it doesn’t come equally to all. Reports show that women are more burned out at work than their male counterparts. Yet, quiet quitting is an option rarely available to women. People of color can face a similar situation where they are scrutinized more than their peers.
The responsibility of representation can also push women and people of color to go above and beyond in their workplace.
An interesting article titled “Quiet Quitting is About Bad Bosses and not Bad Employees” by Harvard Business Review mentions, “quiet quitting is usually less about an employee’s willingness to work harder and more creatively, and more about a manager’s ability to build a relationship with their employees where they are not counting the minutes until quitting time.”
It is vital that all shoulder the burden of productivity in the workplace. A good leader should efficiently observe and balance productivity with employees’ needs. Several ways can be adopted to manage employees better and help them enjoy their work.
Quiet quitting has been met with various reactions. However, even if it is seen in the most favorable light, it is only a band-aid, not the entire treatment. If better workplace conditions are to be achieved, organizations must work as a whole. We must not forget what matters the most: we don’t let human creativity die in the face of a work culture focused on constantly churning out results.
Quiet Quitting is a movement that has taken place in response to poor work-life balance. It is the act of not going above and beyond.
Burnout is a state of excessive physical, emotional, and mental exhaustion caused by a prolonged period of stress. Inefficiency, cynicism, and exhaustion are the most common burnout symptoms.
Quiet quitting might seem like a simple solution to the burnout pandemic but it is temporary and doesn’t seem efficient enough to cure the root cause.
Managers can build up a relationship of trust with their direct reports. They can show that they care by communicating efficiently and recognizing their work regularly.
Related resources: